Elyvris

DIOGO POETA

Research.

My papers, field simulations and research record.

PUBLICATIONS

Journal articles.

Download BibTeX ↓
  1. 2026 · Optical Materials Express

    Energy velocity as an optical design indicator for the ultraviolet nonlinear response of ALD-grown TiO₂ thin films

    D. Poeta, C. Maibohm, C. Calaza, A. Miranda, M. López-García, et al. · 16(10), 3342–3356

  2. 2026 · Environmental Technology & Innovation

    Real-time molecular specific BTEX detection at TLV-TWA concentration levels

    R. Vilarinho, H. Mahmoodnia, C. Maibohm, D. Poeta, et al. · 42, 104895

  3. 2025 · Optics Express

    Volatile organic compound photoionization utilizing tunable quasi-monochromatic vacuum ultraviolet down to 120 nm obtained by third harmonic generation from a suspended dielectric nanomembrane

    R. Vilarinho, H. Mahmoodnia, C. Maibohm, D. Poeta, et al. · 33(12), 26342–26355

  4. 2024 · Optics Letters

    Optical anapoles excited by UV-A illumination

    D. Poeta, R. Vilarinho, M. López-García and P. A. A. De Beule · 49(24), 7198–7201

OPTICAL ANAPOLES

Fields and timing
in TiO₂.

A field-cycle reference and published timing samples from the study of UV-A anapoles.

The electric anapole condition

Electric and toroidal moments cancel their combined leading dipole radiation term while both moments remain non-zero. Other multipoles can still radiate.

Poeta et al. (2024), Eq. (1), using the paper’s Cartesian moment convention.

D = p + i k0c T = 0k0 = 2π / λ0 · |p| ≠ 0 · |T| ≠ 0

3D Meep reference: 190 × 160 × 100 nm TiO₂ in air at 366.5 nm. The central x–y plane shows one steady-state optical cycle on fixed E/H scales.

Optical constants: Jolivet et al. (2023), amorphous ALD TiO₂ deposited at 200 °C: n = 2.8081, κ = 0 at 366.5 nm, from refractiveindex.info.

Calculation, data and scope

The tabulated optical constants are linearly interpolated in wavelength without extrapolation. This calculation holds ε = n² as a real constant at the selected frequency; it does not model broadband dispersion or the paper’s transient formation. Both E and H use the same reconstructed optical phase. The mesh is 6.67 nm at z = 0, with separate fixed display scales. The field map alone does not establish an anapole condition.

Numerical methods ↗Convergence checks ↗Meep source ↗Complex-field data ↗Optical-constant table ↗

Anapole formation: electric and magnetic timing

Published electric and magnetic samples at distinct times.

Scan time 8.30 fsBefore the first reported sample
Reported electric and magnetic timesElectric samples are circles on the upper lane; their paired magnetic samples are diamonds on the lower lane. Connections link the published pairs, separated by 0.26 to 0.32 femtoseconds. The moving cursor scans the time axis. Full values are available in the table below.

Scroll the timeline horizontally to inspect the time spacing ↔

Instance 1 · sample 1 · pair 1 / 14

Electric time tE8.36 fsReported E sample
Magnetic time tH8.63 fsPaired H sample
Offset tH − tE0.27 fsDifference of published times
Reported |E|² / |E₀|²0.733Dimensionless; E value only

Fourteen published pairs across four instances, with E/H offsets of 0.26–0.32 fs. The cursor scans reported events; it does not reconstruct the fields above.

Timing data and source

Data: D. Poeta, R. Vilarinho, M. López-García and P. A. A. De Beule, Optical anapoles excited by UV-A illumination, Optics Letters 49(24), 7198–7201 (2024), article DOI ↗; Supplement 1, Fig. S2, version 5 ↗, CC BY 4.0 ↗. Code, data and methods ↗.

Open data: all fourteen reported time pairs
Transcribed S2 values. Individual rows have no assigned formation, stabilization or decay labels.
Instance / sampletE (fs)tH (fs)Δt (fs)|E|² / |E₀|²